Welding Electrode Comparisons
Side-by-side comparisons of common welding electrodes with specification differences and application guidance.
Choosing between two welding rods usually comes down to three things: what machine you have (AC or DC), what condition the steel is in (clean, rusty, or painted), and whether the weld needs to pass code inspection. Each comparison below covers the spec differences, explains what those differences mean in practice, and identifies the common mistake people make when picking between the two.
If you are not sure where to start, the most common decision is E6010 vs E7018 for pipe and structural work, or E71T-11 vs ER70S-6 for MIG and flux-core process selection. For a broader overview of how electrode numbers work and what they tell you, see the guide to reading welding rod numbers.
Stick Electrode Comparisons
28 comparisons covering the stick welding electrodes most commonly confused with each other. These include structural vs non-structural pairings, AC vs DC considerations, and penetration depth trade-offs.
Wire Comparisons
17 comparisons covering MIG wire and flux-core wire selection. The main decision points are gas vs no-gas, indoor vs outdoor use, and surface cleanliness requirements.
All 46 Comparisons
E6010 vs E6011
Almost identical rods with one critical difference: E6010 is DC only, E6011 runs on AC too.
E6010 vs E7018
These two rods are partners, not competitors.
E6011 vs E6013
Opposite rods for opposite jobs.
E6013 vs E7018
Two of the most common shop rods, but they exist in different worlds.
E7014 vs E7018
Both are 70 ksi rods.
E7018 vs E7024
E7018 goes anywhere.
ER70S-3 vs ER70S-6
Same wire, different deoxidizer levels.
E71T-11 vs ER70S-6
Gas or no gas, that is the choice.
E6010 vs E6013
E6010 is a deep-penetrating pipe rod for dirty metal on DC only.
E6012 vs E6013
Both are easy-running 60 ksi rods for general-purpose work, but E6012 has slightly deeper penetration and runs primarily on AC/DCEN, while E6013 runs on all....
E7016 vs E7018
Both are 70 ksi low-hydrogen rods for code-quality structural welds.
E6013 vs E7014
E6013 is a 60 ksi smooth-running rod for thin material and learning.
E71T-11 vs E71T-GS
Both are self-shielded flux-core wires that work without gas.
E71T-1 vs E71T-11
E71T-1 is gas-shielded flux-core for production shops.
E308L-16 vs E309L-16
E308L-16 is for welding 304 stainless to 304 stainless.
ER4043 vs ER5356
ER4043 is the default aluminum wire for 6061 and cast aluminum.
E7018 vs E71T-11
E7018 is the standard code-quality stick rod.
E6011 vs E7018
E6011 is a deep-penetrating AC-capable rod for dirty metal and field work.
E6020 vs E7024
Both are flat-position high-deposition rods for heavy plate.
ER308L vs E308L-16
Same 308L stainless alloy in two forms: ER308L is bare wire for MIG/TIG, E308L-16 is a coated stick electrode for SMAW.
ER70S-2 vs ER70S-6
ER70S-2 is primarily a TIG filler rod with superior weld purity.
Stick vs Gas-Shielded Flux-Core for Structural Steel
E7018 stick vs E71T-1 gas-shielded flux-core for structural welding.
Solid MIG Wire vs Gas-Shielded Flux-Core for Production Welding
ER70S-6 solid MIG wire vs E71T-1 flux-core for shop fabrication.
Cellulose Stick vs Self-Shielded Flux-Core for Field Welding
E6010 stick vs E71T-11 self-shielded flux-core for outdoor and field repair.
Deep Penetration vs Light Penetration Stick Rods
E6010 deep-digging DC rod vs E6012 light-penetration AC/DC rod.
All-Position vs High-Speed Flat Iron Powder Rods
E7014 all-position easy rod vs E7024 flat-only high-deposition rod.
Marine Stainless vs Standard Stainless Stick Electrode
E316L-16 moly-bearing vs E308L-16 standard stainless.
High-Temperature vs Standard Stainless Welding Rod
E310-16 for furnace and kiln work vs E308L-16 for general stainless.
Unknown Stainless vs Dissimilar Metal Stainless Rod
E312-16 crack-resistant unknown stainless rod vs E309L-16 standard dissimilar metal rod.
Marine vs Standard Stainless MIG & TIG Wire
ER316L moly-bearing wire vs ER308L standard stainless wire.
Dissimilar Metal vs Standard Stainless Wire
ER309L for stainless-to-carbon steel vs ER308L for stainless-to-stainless.
Impact-Tested vs Standard Low-Hydrogen Structural Rod
E7018-1 with -20F impact testing vs standard E7018 with 0F testing.
Seismic-Rated vs General-Purpose Self-Shielded Flux-Core
E71T-8 seismic-rated structural wire vs E71T-11 general-purpose self-shielded.
Nickel Low-Temp vs Standard Gas-Shielded Flux-Core
E81T1-Ni1 for sub-zero toughness vs E71T-1 for standard structural.
High-Silicon Brazing Wire vs Standard Aluminum Filler
ER4047 with 12% silicon for brazing and castings vs ER4043 with 5% silicon for general aluminum welding..
High-Strength vs Standard MIG Wire
ER80S-D2 (80 ksi) for HSLA steel vs ER70S-6 (70 ksi) for mild steel.
Farm Repair Rod vs Easy-Run Shop Rod
E6011 deep-penetration rust-tolerant rod vs E7014 easy-running iron powder rod.
Deep Penetration AC/DC vs Fill-Freeze Production Rod
E6011 cellulose AC/DC rod for field work vs E6012 iron-powder rod for production flat welding..
MIG Wire vs Easy Stick Rod for Beginners
ER70S-6 solid MIG wire vs E6013 easy-run stick rod.
Dissimilar Metal Stainless Wire vs Stick
ER309L wire (MIG/TIG) vs E309L-16 stick for joining stainless to carbon steel.
Marine Stainless Wire vs Stick
ER316L wire (MIG/TIG) vs E316L-16 stick for 316L marine and chemical stainless.
All-Position Penetration vs Flat High-Deposition Stick Rod
E6010 aggressive digging rod vs E6020 heavy fill rod.
AC Low-Hydrogen vs DC Deep Penetration Rod
E7016 low-hydrogen AC rod vs E6010 cellulose DC rod.
Stick Rust Rod vs Self-Shielded Flux-Core for Home Welding
E6011 stick rod vs E71T-11 flux-core wire.
Dissimilar Metal vs Marine Stainless Wire
ER309L for stainless-to-carbon joints vs ER316L for 316L marine applications.
Structural Stick Rod vs MIG Wire for Mild Steel
E7018 low-hydrogen stick vs ER70S-6 MIG wire.